Desplega vs SpurTest
Accelerate Delivery thanks to Quality. Compare how Desplega.ai provides speed, scale, and control without handing over the keys.
Technical Overview
SpurTest and Desplega.ai both tackle test automation at scale, but their approaches differ fundamentally. SpurTest is an AI-powered QA tool that lets you write tests in plain English and unleashes thousands of browser agents to simulate users. Desplega is a fully AI-powered test automation platform that your engineering teams can use directly.
Key Technical Differences
- •Desplega: AI-driven test generation and execution
- •SpurTest: Natural language test creation with AI agents
- •Desplega: Self-service platform with full control
- •SpurTest: Cloud service with external orchestration
Massive Parallel Testing & Speed
Both Desplega and SpurTest are built to eliminate slow sequential testing. SpurTest highlights 100× parallelism – essentially, they can run hundreds or thousands of test steps at once, allowing full regression suites to complete in under 10 minutes. Desplega's architecture is equally capable of massive parallel execution.
We utilize cloud computing efficiently to spin up isolated test agents for each scenario, enabling you to run your entire test suite in parallel every time you deploy. The difference is in control and customizability. With Desplega, your team can configure how tests run using our platform's settings or API.
SpurTest's system is a bit more of a black box: you trust it to run "thousands of agents" on its own terms when you trigger tests. Both will get you speed, but Desplega offers fine-grained control over the process if needed. The outcome is the same – lightning-fast test results (often just a few minutes for complete feedback) – but as CTO you might prefer the solution that can be tuned to your pipeline's needs.
Real-User Simulation vs Intelligent Exploration
A key promise of SpurTest is that their AI agents interact with your application like real users (no reliance on CSS selectors, etc.), making tests more realistic and robust. Desplega shares that philosophy: our agents also perform actions in a human-like way, ensuring that if a feature works for a real user, it will pass our tests.
We use advanced computer vision and context understanding to identify elements and follow flows, so minor UI changes don't break tests. Now, beyond just simulation, Desplega's AI has an exploratory element. It not only follows the exact scripts given; it can intelligently try variations and unexpected paths to uncover potential issues.
SpurTest will execute the scenarios you specify in natural language very effectively, but it generally does what it's told. Desplega's agents have the ability to learn your app's structure and suggest or attempt extra steps (within safe limits) that a human might try. This agent-driven initiative is part of Desplega's approach to leverage all AI at disposal.
Integration and Deployment Flexibility
SpurTest is offered as a cloud service – you access their web platform and run tests on their cloud agents. This is convenient but may raise questions about data and environment control. Desplega offers more deployment flexibility.
We can run on our secure cloud by default, but if needed, we can set up dedicated testing servers or even allow an on-premise agent cluster for customers with strict data requirements. If your application runs in a staging environment behind a firewall, Desplega's architecture can accommodate that via secure connectors or self-hosted runners.
Additionally, Desplega integrates deeply with dev workflows: it provides a rich API and CLI, so your devops team can treat it as part of the toolchain. You can script Desplega actions (like update tests, run subsets, etc.) as needed. SpurTest's focus is more on an easy UI and less on customization – great for quick start, but as CTO you might prefer Desplega'sintegration-friendly design when you want to do advanced things.
Reliability and Maintenance
Both solutions aim to minimize maintenance through AI. SpurTest touts 99% reliability with zero flaky tests(since they don't use brittle selectors). Desplega similarly strives for near-zero false failures – our AI can distinguish between actual bugs and things like minor timing issues or loading delays, and it automatically retries or adapts as needed.
Furthermore, Desplega's maintenance of tests is largely autonomous: when your UI changes, our system updates the test steps without you needing to intervene (unless it's a fundamental flow change). SpurTest likely offers a similar capability since their agents dynamically find elements by context each time.
One area of difference: human oversight vs tool oversight. SpurTest's team, especially during onboarding, might help set up tests and ensure they're running correctly. Desplega is designed so that your team can handle it without external help – and the AI does most of the heavy lifting in maintenance. This self-reliance can be important for a CTO who valuesoperational simplicity.
Analytics and Investment per Area
As a technology leader, you likely want insight into how your QA is performing. Desplega, being a mission control for QA, offersanalytics dashboards that break down test coverage by feature area, module, or user persona. You can see which parts of the app have the most failures, which have the least automated coverage, etc.
This ties to the concept of defining QA investment per area – you get data to decide where to direct more testing effort. For example, if analytics show that 20% of critical bugs are coming from the checkout flow, you might allocate more AI agents to generate variations on checkout tests. With a few clicks or a prompt, Desplega will beef up testing in that area.
SpurTest's product is very focused on executing tests effectively; it's not clear if it provides the same level of business intelligence around testing. Likely, you'll see test run results and perhaps coverage of flows you've written, but not an analysis of untested areas. Desplega's AI, because it scans your app and understands it, can highlight potential blind spots.
Cost and Value for Tech Teams
In terms of pricing models, both are premium AI testing solutions, but let's consider value delivered. SpurTest might charge based on usage or enterprise contracts; Desplega's pricing is likewise aligned with mid-to-large team usage.
The value comes in when considering avoiding costs elsewhere: with Desplega, some CTOs have found theydidn't need to hire as many additional QA engineers or SDETs, because the AI platform covered a bulk of automation needs. SpurTest would likely offer a similar value prop.
However, because Desplega is self-serve and doesn't bundle human services, our pricing often ends up more favorablefor comparable output. Essentially, you're not paying a margin for a managed service layer; you're paying for the technology directly. Also, Desplega can reduce developer toil – fewer late-night bug fixes, fewer firefights after releases – which in turn saves developer time (which is costly).
Bottom Line for CTOs
From a CTO perspective, Desplega provides the technical firepower of SpurTest's AI testing, with greater flexibility and controlfor your team. You get the same "wow factor" of thousands of user-like tests running in parallel, but packaged in a way that you can integrate, customize, and trust long-term within your organization.
Desplega's commitment to using all available AI and acting as QA mission control means it's not just a tool, but a strategic platform for quality engineering. If you want cutting-edge QA automation on your own terms (and not as a one-size-fits-all service), Desplega is the clear choice.
Ready to accelerate delivery?
Drive quality at scale with Desplega. Schedule a demo or start a trial to see how Desplega's AI can handle tens of thousands of tests with ease.
Technical Comparison

Our AI-powered platform accelerates test execution through parallel processing, intelligent test generation, and seamless CI/CD integration for faster delivery cycles.