FOSS · MIT—Open-source agent-swarm, the operating system for all your AI agents→
How-To/Optimize ECC Agent Harness Performance for Claude, Codex & Cursor | desplega.ai

Optimize ECC Agent Harness Performance for Claude, Codex & Cursor | desplega.ai

Speed up your ECC agent harness for Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor with targeted config tweaks, parallelism tuning, and automated E2E test coverage.

Multi-provider agent harnesses tend to accumulate latency the moment you plug in more than one model. Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor all have distinct rate limits, streaming behaviors, and tool-call semantics — running them sequentially against the same suite is the single biggest reason ECC (Extended Context Coding) test pipelines slow to a crawl. This guide walks through the exact configuration passes we apply on real desplega.ai projects to cut harness wall-clock time by 40–70%. If you also run Model Context Protocol servers alongside these agents, pair this with our MCP best practices guide so cache keys and tool schemas stay aligned across both layers.

Audit Your Current Harness Baseline

Before touching a single config knob, run your existing ECC agent harness suite end-to-end and capture timing metrics. Without a concrete baseline you cannot prove that later changes actually improved anything — and you risk celebrating a variance blip. Export results as JSON so the desplega diff tool can compare runs later.

npx desplega run --suite ecc-agent --reporter json --output baseline-report.json

Enable Parallel Agent Execution

The default harness runs agent steps serially so failures are easy to trace. Once you have a baseline, crank concurrency to match your CPU thread count. Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor calls are almost entirely I/O-bound, so oversubscribing threads by 1.5x is usually safe and can shave minutes off longer suites.

// desplega.config.ts
export default {
  agent: {
    concurrency: 8,          // match your CPU thread count
    timeout: 30_000,         // ms per agent step
    retryOnFlake: 2
  }
};

Configure Provider-Specific Agent Adapters

Each provider has its own quirks — Claude's tool-use blocks, Codex's function calling, and Cursor's IDE-scoped endpoints all need dedicated adapters. Register them explicitly so the harness routes prompts correctly and applies per-provider token budgets instead of a global lowest-common-denominator setting.

// desplega.config.ts  (extend the object above)
import { claudeAdapter, codexAdapter, cursorAdapter } from '@desplega/adapters';

export default {
  agent: { concurrency: 8, timeout: 30_000, retryOnFlake: 2 },
  providers: [
    claudeAdapter({ model: 'claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022', maxTokens: 4096 }),
    codexAdapter({ model: 'gpt-4o',                     maxTokens: 4096 }),
    cursorAdapter({ endpoint: process.env.CURSOR_API_URL })
  ]
};

Implement Harness-Level Caching for Repeated Prompts

Most ECC suites re-execute nearly identical prompts across runs — same fixtures, same seed, same model. Turning on the built-in prompt cache converts those redundant round-trips into zero-cost local reads. Use the filesystem driver for local dev and Redis in CI so parallel runners share the same warm cache.

// desplega.config.ts  (add cache block)
export default {
  agent: { concurrency: 8, timeout: 30_000, retryOnFlake: 2 },
  cache: {
    enabled: true,
    driver: 'filesystem',    // 'redis' for CI clusters
    ttl: 3600,               // seconds
    keyFields: ['prompt', 'model', 'temperature']
  },
  providers: [ /* ... */ ]
};

Scope E2E Tests to Changed Agent Paths Only

Full-suite reruns on every commit are almost never worth it. desplega's impact-analysis flag walks the dependency graph from your git diff and executes only the tests that touch changed agent code. On mature repos this alone typically drops CI time from 20+ minutes to under 3.

npx desplega run --suite ecc-agent --changed-only --base origin/main

Add desplega E2E Assertions for Agent Output Quality

Performance wins mean nothing if agent output quality regresses. Write desplega specs that assert on structured outputs — code diffs, file edits, tool-call payloads — instead of raw text. That way a subtle behavior drift in Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor is caught by CI rather than by a customer.

// tests/ecc-agent.spec.ts
import { test, expect } from '@desplega/test';

test('Claude Code applies the suggested refactor', async ({ agent }) => {
  const result = await agent.run('Refactor this function to use async/await', {
    provider: 'claude',
    context: { file: 'src/utils.ts' }
  });
  expect(result.edits).toContainKey('src/utils.ts');
  expect(result.edits['src/utils.ts']).toMatch(/async.*await/);
});

Compare Results Against Baseline and Iterate

Re-run the optimized harness, generate a second JSON report, and diff it against your baseline. desplega surfaces per-provider latency deltas and any newly failing assertions in a single view so you can approve or roll back changes with confidence before merging.

npx desplega run --suite ecc-agent --reporter json --output optimized-report.json
npx desplega diff baseline-report.json optimized-report.json